I love every morning, when a student gets up to go to class, understand that there, in your college or university that every teacher to teach the class, or a dad to review the work at night, are the scenarios where played the country's sovereignty, the power differential future.
I'm not soft, I'm a clean hard.
What built the Uribe government are not going to destroy.
Colombia's history will be written in pencil, not blood.
(On the FARC), an exchange or sleeves. An exchange which would generate the same cycle. It is spoiling. FARC is to teach his methods are effective. And the first thing one has to do with phenomena such as terrorism is to demonstrate that society does not yield to terrorism.
I be able to put the best of me, but most of calling people to put their best.
Our proposal of Democratic Legality retain the gains in safety were achieved. But there will not be enough police and soldiers, needs justice and social rejection.
Building on the buildings. Recognize what is already well done, and use it as a foundation for what lies ahead. Colombian
: conozcámosnos. Abrámosnos the chance to see how the other, how complex it is, how beautiful it is, how generous it is. Is to discover much of our suspicions are unwarranted, and to discover beautiful beings. Let the best of which come out now. To help everyone put on the table, take action, its best side.
I think people know that legitimately use force when needed because it did in Bogotá. But given the gravity of the conflict, a considerable part of the Colombian people seem willing to tolerate any means in order to get peace. Faced with the tragedy of war, think that anything goes. Therefore, they may fear that giving power to someone like me who prefers to sacrifice goals, rather than using illegitimate methods, I will not be as effective in getting results. I think we tested otherwise in Bogotá, which can be legitimate means lasting results.
must understand the law. Instead of "published and complied with, the laws end up saying" To be published, explain, understand and follow "
I do not like that everything is negotiable, affordable, as if the country were handled through a commercial logic.
we send the message that drug dealer who goal is selling its life time, as in a club of those that one makes each month and one day win the car or the house, every business day that the drug will bet to win the shot. They all have very short life expectancy. We can also make society think about the problems of addiction to easy money. I
we mend the illegality.
(On the new criminal gangs): you need legal pressure, or justice, police, army, but it takes too blame, that is most difficult to produce, or need a Dostoevsky to write the Colombian telenovelas. .. Crime and Punishment. It needs self-regulation, national self-reflection.
I think people understand a little bit bad and a lot of good. And without taking his hand in understanding the hard way, people are troubled.
Banning child labor has to become something like the existing ban to hit the mother. That is, any possibility of effective punishment but also to give you a tremendous guilt that creates the situation. I live
defending compliance and when I have to be repressive am without hesitation. But many times the word can cause major effects.
wins the electoral process if allegations rather than subjective, emotional, reckless and contrary to law, discussed with arguments.
carrot
One more country, a country where anything goes, a country where productivity rises too high, and enables the ideals of the Constitution because people do not killed and because people do not take certain shortcuts. A country where law and culture are closer to where legal obligations are culturally supported, pay taxes, respect the land, respect, obviously, the fundamental rights of others.
If our relationship with the law is distant, no mucho.
(On the continuity of the Democratic Security): I worry about the lack of confidence that we are able to continue a task that we have considered and recognized as valuable. The high mountain battalions that were made in the Calera and Sumapaz made during my tenure on the basis of safety tips and the work we did with army.
The severity of the frequency of illegal behavior is added to the gravity of the frequency with which citizens do not justify corruption corrupt or normalize ("to steal, but at least make works").
We want a policy arguments, where participation is well regarded, and our icons are not the drug dealer or the citizens 'living' that is passed through the band's legality.
The 'anything goes' is the plague of any society.
I will consolidate management and pedagogically Democratic Security and transition to democratic rule. The rule of law is reflected in respect for the Police and Armed Forces, but also stems from respect for the prosecutor and the judge. What made against the FARC Uribe will I do with any violent illegality (including FARC). Prefer
good that everyone has.
If you are voting for me, but not doing it in good conscience, not because you decide ... Better not vote for me. Vote for the one who tells his conscience. He or she who tells his conscience.
talk a lot of insecurity increases fear, but about increases the responsibility of citizenship. The city cultural approach emphasizes self-regulation. In contrast, all the time to mention the problem of security infantilizes the population, because only expected answers from the State
not know anyone who for 20 years in prison and decide to kill someone to stop doing it for 30. The increased penalties are for the gallery.
not offer an easy ride, but one of consolidation. It is as if they put a foundation stone and concrete, and now play in building more or less the same proportions of brick and sand. Strengthen security and justice components of social control, and strengthen further the education, for reasons of productivity and competitiveness, deserves a large financial outlay.
Informémonos before you vote, know the options, read the menu before ordering.
In Colombia we have to be is jointly responsible. We have to take care of each, covered between all, not to do things Chambon. It's civic culture.
Fair play has a huge effect on enemy morale. Today the struggle in Colombia is not between parties but against anything goes against justify breaking the law in order to get a supposedly superior order.
Public resources are sacred resources.
If the law is corruption, as in Bogotá, we must generate the rejection of the population to stop the trap to be well regarded. Otherwise it is very difficult because if you see that others are corrupt is becoming more lax with himself. The
is a drug dealer addicted to easy money.
(Interviewed on the achievements of their mayors): there is a tendency to rely on individual leaders. To me, it is important to develop collective leadership. I do not like to receive credit for all they've accomplished. Millions of people contributed to the results we achieve. I like more egalitarian relationships. And I especially like to orient people to learn.
historically is unacceptable 'Loach' tax Colombian landowners.
I do not really like that democracy depends on a lot of money, and I think people understand it and all candidates should make efforts not to spend maximum but spend much less. That would make more credible democracy. Democracy is about debate and vote after listening.
believe in deliberative democracy: argument goes, an argument is. Interests, to become public, are moderated or polished.
emphatically believe that we must fight easy justifications of violence: the sociology improvised on poverty that begets only violence. The commission of crime is much more horizontal than it is believed
'm a teacher, and the idea that someone is hopeless the rejection.
grave seems to me that Colombian society is not enough outrage at crimes against humanity.
The act of voting is a delicate act, and I see that the campaign is like a mutual approach where people are listening and sniffing, is one thing both ways. The most important thing is that people should rejoice their choices.
Colombia has suffered widespread discourse friend or foe.
In certain regions of Colombia tends to be illegal economic enclaves. It is not there in the shade, but the opposite: there are regions and subregions of the illegal living. There the struggle is more complex, but not impossible. As a country, the defeat of the illegality is a great benefit. For some groups, would be a great loss, substantive brutal. In summary, I would say that drug trafficking has Colombian people to sell their lives, and that is unacceptable and unreasonable. Human life is not for sale
I do not afraid to apply the authority to enforce the law. But the authority must be applied based on pedagogy, rather than force, because that's what makes it legitimate.
Although most people act rejects the justifications for flouting the law, just under half the illegality justified if it is for the family, to do justice or to defend property. There are clear signs of cultural acceptance of illegality.
People today live an illusion of being in the mix of growth economic and reducing violence. But behind it is a terrible ambiguity of the rules, making the short flight safety, and predicts more violence in the future. So we need change and governance. Today is when we cry harder not to follow the road to justify any action to obtain quick results. If we do not, in a few years we will regret it. Antanas Mockus
I'm not soft, I'm a clean hard.
What built the Uribe government are not going to destroy.
Colombia's history will be written in pencil, not blood.
(On the FARC), an exchange or sleeves. An exchange which would generate the same cycle. It is spoiling. FARC is to teach his methods are effective. And the first thing one has to do with phenomena such as terrorism is to demonstrate that society does not yield to terrorism.
I be able to put the best of me, but most of calling people to put their best.
Our proposal of Democratic Legality retain the gains in safety were achieved. But there will not be enough police and soldiers, needs justice and social rejection.
Building on the buildings. Recognize what is already well done, and use it as a foundation for what lies ahead. Colombian
: conozcámosnos. Abrámosnos the chance to see how the other, how complex it is, how beautiful it is, how generous it is. Is to discover much of our suspicions are unwarranted, and to discover beautiful beings. Let the best of which come out now. To help everyone put on the table, take action, its best side.
I think people know that legitimately use force when needed because it did in Bogotá. But given the gravity of the conflict, a considerable part of the Colombian people seem willing to tolerate any means in order to get peace. Faced with the tragedy of war, think that anything goes. Therefore, they may fear that giving power to someone like me who prefers to sacrifice goals, rather than using illegitimate methods, I will not be as effective in getting results. I think we tested otherwise in Bogotá, which can be legitimate means lasting results.
must understand the law. Instead of "published and complied with, the laws end up saying" To be published, explain, understand and follow "
I do not like that everything is negotiable, affordable, as if the country were handled through a commercial logic.
we send the message that drug dealer who goal is selling its life time, as in a club of those that one makes each month and one day win the car or the house, every business day that the drug will bet to win the shot. They all have very short life expectancy. We can also make society think about the problems of addiction to easy money. I
we mend the illegality.
(On the new criminal gangs): you need legal pressure, or justice, police, army, but it takes too blame, that is most difficult to produce, or need a Dostoevsky to write the Colombian telenovelas. .. Crime and Punishment. It needs self-regulation, national self-reflection.
I think people understand a little bit bad and a lot of good. And without taking his hand in understanding the hard way, people are troubled.
Banning child labor has to become something like the existing ban to hit the mother. That is, any possibility of effective punishment but also to give you a tremendous guilt that creates the situation. I live
defending compliance and when I have to be repressive am without hesitation. But many times the word can cause major effects.
wins the electoral process if allegations rather than subjective, emotional, reckless and contrary to law, discussed with arguments.
carrot
One more country, a country where anything goes, a country where productivity rises too high, and enables the ideals of the Constitution because people do not killed and because people do not take certain shortcuts. A country where law and culture are closer to where legal obligations are culturally supported, pay taxes, respect the land, respect, obviously, the fundamental rights of others.
If our relationship with the law is distant, no mucho.
(On the continuity of the Democratic Security): I worry about the lack of confidence that we are able to continue a task that we have considered and recognized as valuable. The high mountain battalions that were made in the Calera and Sumapaz made during my tenure on the basis of safety tips and the work we did with army.
The severity of the frequency of illegal behavior is added to the gravity of the frequency with which citizens do not justify corruption corrupt or normalize ("to steal, but at least make works").
We want a policy arguments, where participation is well regarded, and our icons are not the drug dealer or the citizens 'living' that is passed through the band's legality.
The 'anything goes' is the plague of any society.
I will consolidate management and pedagogically Democratic Security and transition to democratic rule. The rule of law is reflected in respect for the Police and Armed Forces, but also stems from respect for the prosecutor and the judge. What made against the FARC Uribe will I do with any violent illegality (including FARC). Prefer
good that everyone has.
If you are voting for me, but not doing it in good conscience, not because you decide ... Better not vote for me. Vote for the one who tells his conscience. He or she who tells his conscience.
talk a lot of insecurity increases fear, but about increases the responsibility of citizenship. The city cultural approach emphasizes self-regulation. In contrast, all the time to mention the problem of security infantilizes the population, because only expected answers from the State
not know anyone who for 20 years in prison and decide to kill someone to stop doing it for 30. The increased penalties are for the gallery.
not offer an easy ride, but one of consolidation. It is as if they put a foundation stone and concrete, and now play in building more or less the same proportions of brick and sand. Strengthen security and justice components of social control, and strengthen further the education, for reasons of productivity and competitiveness, deserves a large financial outlay.
Informémonos before you vote, know the options, read the menu before ordering.
In Colombia we have to be is jointly responsible. We have to take care of each, covered between all, not to do things Chambon. It's civic culture.
Fair play has a huge effect on enemy morale. Today the struggle in Colombia is not between parties but against anything goes against justify breaking the law in order to get a supposedly superior order.
Public resources are sacred resources.
If the law is corruption, as in Bogotá, we must generate the rejection of the population to stop the trap to be well regarded. Otherwise it is very difficult because if you see that others are corrupt is becoming more lax with himself. The
is a drug dealer addicted to easy money.
(Interviewed on the achievements of their mayors): there is a tendency to rely on individual leaders. To me, it is important to develop collective leadership. I do not like to receive credit for all they've accomplished. Millions of people contributed to the results we achieve. I like more egalitarian relationships. And I especially like to orient people to learn.
historically is unacceptable 'Loach' tax Colombian landowners.
I do not really like that democracy depends on a lot of money, and I think people understand it and all candidates should make efforts not to spend maximum but spend much less. That would make more credible democracy. Democracy is about debate and vote after listening.
believe in deliberative democracy: argument goes, an argument is. Interests, to become public, are moderated or polished.
emphatically believe that we must fight easy justifications of violence: the sociology improvised on poverty that begets only violence. The commission of crime is much more horizontal than it is believed
'm a teacher, and the idea that someone is hopeless the rejection.
grave seems to me that Colombian society is not enough outrage at crimes against humanity.
The act of voting is a delicate act, and I see that the campaign is like a mutual approach where people are listening and sniffing, is one thing both ways. The most important thing is that people should rejoice their choices.
Colombia has suffered widespread discourse friend or foe.
In certain regions of Colombia tends to be illegal economic enclaves. It is not there in the shade, but the opposite: there are regions and subregions of the illegal living. There the struggle is more complex, but not impossible. As a country, the defeat of the illegality is a great benefit. For some groups, would be a great loss, substantive brutal. In summary, I would say that drug trafficking has Colombian people to sell their lives, and that is unacceptable and unreasonable. Human life is not for sale
I do not afraid to apply the authority to enforce the law. But the authority must be applied based on pedagogy, rather than force, because that's what makes it legitimate.
Although most people act rejects the justifications for flouting the law, just under half the illegality justified if it is for the family, to do justice or to defend property. There are clear signs of cultural acceptance of illegality.
People today live an illusion of being in the mix of growth economic and reducing violence. But behind it is a terrible ambiguity of the rules, making the short flight safety, and predicts more violence in the future. So we need change and governance. Today is when we cry harder not to follow the road to justify any action to obtain quick results. If we do not, in a few years we will regret it. Antanas Mockus
bell visionary president 2010 2014 election 
Colombia
Colombia 
