In the meeting on March 2 with the Mayor, it became clear its intention not to change one iota what at the time carried out without prior consultation with the locals.
Clearly, we have suspended the two proposals submitted to it, but it is also clear that teachers have not been evaluated the same as the residents of that area have.
We wished that the technicians of the Department of Public Roads, at least a neighbor had been invited to be present in these assessments, but it seems that this is best done behind closed doors and then adjust the assessment to what they had expected. This does not mean that they did wrong, but what is clear is that public participation is allowed only after consummated acts.
However, we also do a comparison without data hiding or invent others, for neighbors and the public to rate it from more conventional logic and participatory.
Given the Mayor's statement that "the bike path Manuel de Falla is a project of the entire city, not just a street," we fully agree, and what we all want it to be real, integral for a future investment for sustainable transport.
to see if the participatory process announced to develop the Citizens' Pact for the bike in Alcobendas, it is true that we take into account citizens.
Because in the case of Manuel de Falla, was not taken into account either before, during, or after.
We all advocate that the project of connecting Madrid, Alcobendas and San Sebastian de los Reyes through bike lanes, a reality now and that will make us greener and Europe. This
neighbors say Manuel de Falla, who continue collecting signatures for that project is not cut pedestrian paths or open spaces. Alcobendas
March 5, 2010
0 comments:
Post a Comment